What you Need for an Accident at Work Compensation Claim

Businessman slipping on wet office floor

If you have been injured in an accident in the workplace that was caused by the negligence of your employer, you are entitled to make a claim for compensation. However, many people do not claim the compensation they deserve, and sometimes this is down to uncertainty about the claims process, what it involves, and what exactly is needed to make a valid and successful claim.

Legal Assistance

Of course, making a work accident claim will require professional legal assistance. There are many firms which specialise in making personal injury claims generally and in claiming compensation for accidents in the workplace specifically, and they will offer in-depth expertise and valuable assistance throughout the claims process. The help of a solicitor is virtually essential for making a compensation claim. Even if it were not strictly necessary, however, hiring a solicitor would probably still be advisable as having the help and support of a specialist as well as having somebody else to handle the paperwork and technicalities of the process is invaluable for many claimants.

Information

From the earliest stages of making a claim, you will at a minimum need some basic information about the accident. This should ideally include when and where the accident took place, and the injuries that you sustained as a result of it. You should also be able to explain to your solicitor why you feel your employer (or, in some cases, a specific superior or co-worker) was responsible for the accident. In order for this party – the defendant – to be legally responsible, they must have been negligent in some way and not taken all necessary or reasonable steps to protect your safety.

Documents and Evidence

You will also need to have certain documents and evidence to support your case – and other documents, while not necessary, could be very useful. Your solicitor will outline to you want kind of evidence and documentation is necessary when you begin your claim, but it can be useful to have some idea ahead of time so you can begin preparations sooner. Initially, you will need to present proof of your identity to your solicitor, as well as documents relating to any relevant insurance policies. At later stages, you may have to provide evidence of the nature and extent of your injuries such as photographs or medical documents. You may also have to present evidence relating to the accident itself such as photographs of the location, any records of the accident or reports that were made, and written statements from witnesses. Many of these are documents you are unlikely top have at the initial stage but can set about obtaining as your claim progresses.

TV Pundit loses age discrimination case

Legendary racing pundit John McCririck was given his “pantomime persona” as the reason for his dismissal from broadcaster Channel 4 due to the fact that it was “unpalatable” to a nationwide audience. An employment tribunal stated that this was a sufficient and just reason for the dismissal of the 73-year-old horse racing pundit.

An employment panel gave a unanimous decision against Mr McCririck who alleged that he had been given the sack following an astonishing 29 year long career in television due to his old age. The employment tribunal however favoured the argument put forward by Channel 4 who argued that the sacking was part of a wider plan to introduce horse racing to a wider more diverse audience.

The applicant in this case, Mr McCririck stated that this decision and the reasoning behind it showed a “historic setback” for those over 30 who wish to lodge claims for unfair dismissal based on age discrimination. The racing pundit earlier in the year took TV production company IMG Media Limited as well as Channel 4 to the tribunal while seeking to be compensated in the sum of £3m for the damages caused. Both parties denied and defended the allegations of discrimination. As expected both Channel 4 and IMG welcomed the decision reached by the e Central London Employment Tribunal.

While at the forefront of Channel 4’s racing coverage the racing pundit became famous with his attire consisting of gold jewellery, deer-stalker hats and wild gesticulations. On later TV appearances such as Wife Swap and Big Brother Mr McCririck confessed to his “pantomime villain” appearance. The aging pundit was replaced by a revamped team headed by Clare Balding when Channel 4 obtained broadcasting rights for horse racing in March 2012.

In the report the tribunal panel concluded that having obtained rights to broad cast Royal Ascot and the Grand National which are considered to be the crown jewels of the sport, it was evident why the broadcaster wanted to appeal to a younger audience  while maintaining its existent over 55 male audients.

The tribunal went on to state that Mr McCririck’s celebrity profile had increased after airing his personal views on matters which were previously not known to the public. The report referred to the pundit being asked to leave other well-known TV programmes such as Hell’s Kitchen, Alan Titchmarsh, and Loose Women, following the publication of his views.